Pronechen v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Case Number: 2:2006cv01726
Filed: August 4, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 169 JUDGMENT dated *1/24/11* pursuant to order signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 1/24/11 in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff. (Donati, J)
January 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 01/13/11 ORDERING that Court OVERRULES dft's 130 objections to plf's Exhibits 3, 5A, 12, and 13. The Court need not rule on dft's objections to exhibits 7 and 8 as the plf has withdrawn both exhbits. The Court notes that the admission of this evidence is still subject to other evidentiary objections that may be raised by the dft DHS at trial. (Benson, A.)
January 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 1/5/2011 ORDERING that dft's 127 Motion in Limine No. 1 is DENIED. Dft's 128 Motion in Limine No. 2 is GRANTED; Dft's 129 Motion in Limine No. 3 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.(Duong, D)
November 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER re 125 Joing Pretrial Conference Statement. The Court rejects any request for bifurcation of the timeliness issue from the merits claim. The Court finds that Plaintiff is required to offer all financial calculations of his back pay and benef its at trial. The Court will not put Plaintiffs request fordamages in abeyance pending the outcome of this case at trial. All financial calculations regarding Plaintiffs alleged back pay and benefits must bepresented at trial. The Court will not ente rtain evidence of calculations after the trial as Plaintiff suggests in the Joint Pretrial Conference Statement. The Final Pretrial Conference of 11/30/2010 is RESCHEDULED for a TELEPHONIC Final Pretrial Conference for 12/14/2010 at 11:00 AM before S enior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew.Counsel are instructed to electronically lodge with the Court a Proposed Pretrial Order within fourteen (14) days after the FinalPretrial Conference in accordance with Local Rule 283.Counsel shall also contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk via email at Kelly_Davis@cacd.uscourts.gov with contact information for the Telephonic Final Pretrial Conference by December 10, 2010.(Souvannarath, A)
April 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 119 STATEMENT OF UNCONTROVERTED FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 4/14/2010 re 118 Order. (Matson, R)
January 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting defendant DHS' 87 Motion to Strike. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motion to strike is GRANTED and the following portions of plaintiffs reply brief and supporting documents are hereby stricken from the record:1. The new argument found at page 3, line 15 through page 4, line 28 of the reply brief 83 ; 2. The entire supporting exhibit entitled EEOC MD 110 Chapter 5 - Agency Processing of Formal Complaints [83-2]; and3. Paragraph 3.b of the Declaration of Ronald Pronechen in Support of Motion to Amend 84 . Signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 1-26-10. (Souvannarath, A)
August 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 77 AMENDED 75 ORDER granting plaintiff's 65 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 8/7/2009. Designation of Expert Witnesses cut-off date is 12/18/2009. All Discovery shall be completed by 10/21/2009. All Dispositive Motions to be tendered by 1/21/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/23/2010 at 10:00 AM and Court Trial set for 5/18/2010 at 10:00 AM in Visiting Judge (TBD). (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pronechen v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?