Cunningham v. Finn et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv02238
Filed: October 11, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/4/10 ORDERING the 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED IN FULL; repondent's motion to dismiss 15 is DENIED; a certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE in this action; and this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED (Carlos, K)
November 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/2/09 RECOMMENDING that respondent's 15 motion to dismiss be denied; and this action be dismissed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 20 days. (Yin, K)
August 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/18/09 ordering that within 30 days of the date of service of this order petitioner shall either: file an opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss explaining why this action has no been rendered moot, or file a request to voluntarily dismiss this action. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. Finn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?