Cunningham v. Finn et al
2:2006cv02238 |
October 11, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Frank C. Damrell |
Dale A. Drozd |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/4/10 ORDERING the 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED IN FULL; repondent's motion to dismiss 15 is DENIED; a certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE in this action; and this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED (Carlos, K) |
Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/2/09 RECOMMENDING that respondent's 15 motion to dismiss be denied; and this action be dismissed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 20 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/18/09 ordering that within 30 days of the date of service of this order petitioner shall either: file an opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss explaining why this action has no been rendered moot, or file a request to voluntarily dismiss this action. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cunningham v. Finn et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.