Rockers
| 2:2006cv02330 |
| October 3, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Hutton on 07/06/09 RECOMMENDING that the Temporary Stay 34 be terminated; and 35 Motion To Dismiss be granted; and 12 Amended Petition be denied as moot. Referred to Judge Whaley. Objections to F&R's are due within 10 days of service of this order. (Streeter, J)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Chief Judge Robert H. Whaley on 4/9/2009 re 33 Findings and Recommendations; petition is STAYED; the parties are directed to file a status certification within 30 days from the date of the final disposition of the en banc rehearing granted in Hayward v. Marshall. (Gaydosh, J)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Hutton on 1/30/09 ORDERING that the parties are directed to show cause on or before February 20, 2009, why a temporary stay should not issue in this matter. (Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rockers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
