Sandoval v. Tilton
Petitioner: |
Herman Garcia Sandoval |
Respondent: |
James Tilton and Attorney General of the State of California |
Case Number: |
2:2007cv00004 |
Filed: |
January 4, 2007 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
County: |
Amador |
Presiding Judge: |
Frank C. Damrell |
Presiding Judge: |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Nature of Suit: |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 5, 2010 |
Filing
49
REPORT and RECOMMENDATION signed by Magistrate Judge John L. Weinberg on 8/4/10 RECOMMENDING that the 38 Second Amended Petition be denied and judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. Referred to Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Objections to R&R due within 14 days of service. (Owen, K)
|
July 2, 2010 |
Filing
42
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO LODGE STATE COURT RECORD AND NOTICE OF SANCTIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John L. Weinberg on 7/1/10 ORDERING that on or before Wednesday, June 7, 2010, counsel for respondent shall file all relevant portions of the Reporter's Transcript and Clerk's Transcript in compliance with this Court's Order and all federal and local rules. (Becknal, R)
|
June 4, 2010 |
Filing
39
SECOND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge John L. Weinberg on 6/4/10, ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this Order respondent shall explain in writing why respondent has failed to file a response within the time permitted, SHOW CAUSE in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with this Court's 3/1/10, Order, and lodge a proposed Answer to the Second Amended Petition.(Kastilahn, A)
|
December 14, 2009 |
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John L. Weinberg on 12/14/2009 ORDERING Petitioner's Fourth Request for Stay and Abeyance (Dkt. 31) is STRICKEN as moot; W/in 90 days of the date of this Order, petitioner is directed to file a second amended pet ition, incorporating all exhausted federal habeas claims for relief; This is without prejudice to any defenses respondent might wish to present; and the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez.(Matson, R)
|
October 22, 2009 |
Filing
32
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge John L. Weinberg on 10/22/09 ORDERING Respondent to SHOW CAUSE within 30 days of the date of this Order why this case should not be stayed pending exhaustion of petitioners remaining claims in the Califo rnia Supreme Court; if respondent fails to file a response to this Order within (30) days, the court will construe the lack of response to mean that respondent has no objection to the stay; Petitioners three prior motions or requests for a stay and a beyance of these proceedings (Dkts. 26-28) are STRICKEN as moot; Petitioners Motion to Request the Invocation of the Stay and Abeyance Procedure 31 is RENOTED for 12/4/09; and the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez. (Carlos, K)
|
October 1, 2009 |
Filing
30
ORDER signed by District Judge Ricardo S. Martinez on 9/30/2009 ORDERING that this matter is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge John L. Weinberg. The Magistrate Judge shall hear and enter into the record a Report and Recommendation. (Matson, R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?