USA v. Real Property located at 1903 Melo Road, Mt. Shasta, CA
United States of America |
Real Property located at 1903 Melo Road, Mt. Shasta, California |
Patience, Inc. and America's Servicing Company as Nominee for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. |
2:2007cv00457 |
March 9, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
William B. Shubb |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/29/09: This matter is stayed for an additional 90 days or until the related criminal case currently pending in state court is resolved. Scheduling Conference RESET for 5/18/2009 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 01/21/09 GRANTING 21 Stipulation For Stay. This matter is stayed for an additional 60 days or until the related criminal case currently pending in state court is resolved. Scheduling Conference is reset for 2/9/2009 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Streeter, J) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/12/07 GRANTING 2 Application and Proposed Order. (Manzer, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.