Walker v. Kramer
Petitioner: Edmond Oscar Walker
Respondent: M. C. Kramer
Case Number: 2:2007cv00803
Filed: April 27, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Presiding Judge: David F. Levi
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 12/22/10 DENYING request for Evideniary Hearing; DENYING 61 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Governors reve rsal of the decision of the Board of Parole Hearings is VACATED and the decision of the Board of Parole Hearings REINSTATED. this matter is remanded to the California Board of Parole Hearings for a determination of Walkers release date under otherwis e applicable California law as though the Boards decision had not been reversed by the Governor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, for the purposes of applying the maximum period of parole as provided in California Penal Code § 3000, the release date as determined by the Board of Parole Hearings in conformance with this decision is deemed to be the effective date of Walkers release to parole status. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
July 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 7/19/2010 ORDERING that 56 Motion to Lift Stay is DENIED. On or before, 8/9/2010, each party must separately serve and file a brief, not exceeding 15 pages in length, setting forth the party's position on the impact of Hayward on this case. (Zignago, K.)
April 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER denying 52 Motion to Dismiss signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 4/8/10: Order Staying Proceedings previously entered in this case is to remain in full force and effect 50 . (Kaminski, H)
February 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 2/10/09 ORDERING that Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration 48 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is STAYED pending the issuance of the mandate by the USCA for the Ninth Circu it. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should the Petitioner be granted parole, not later than 30 days after the decision of the Board of Parole Hearings becomes effective, Respondent is directed to inform the Court of the action of the Board and the date Petitioner is scheduled to be released on parole. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 2/11/2009 (Souvannarath, A).
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 1/26/2009 within 15 days of the date of this order, the parties are to show cause why further proceedings in this matter should not be stayed pending the issuance of the mandate by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (Reader, L)
February 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K Singleton on 02/08/08 ordering the 14 Findings and Recommendations filed 08/28/07 are REJECTED. Respondent's 10 MOTION to DISMISS is DENIED without prejudice. Respondent is ordered to file a response wi thin 45 days of the date of this order including therewith a certified copy of the complete petition for habeas relief filed in the California Supreme Court, Case No. S146732. Petitioner's reply or traverse, if any, to be served and filed not later than 30 days after service of respondent's answer or other response. (Plummer, M)
May 9, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/9/07 ORDERING that within 30 days, Ptnr shall submit an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send Ptnr a copy of the IFP form used by this district. (Engbretson, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edmond Oscar Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. C. Kramer
Represented By: Krista Leigh Pollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?