Sims v. Veal et al
Plaintiff: Stanley Sims
Defendant: D. Haverson, R. St. Germain, N. Grannis, Veal and Taylor
Case Number: 2:2007cv00898
Filed: May 11, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/11/2013. This case is SET for a Settlement Conference on 2/6/2013 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. Settlement Statements should NOT be filed with Clerk, served on any other party, nor longer than 5 pages. Settlements Statements shall be clearly marked "CONFIDENTIAL" with date and time of Conference Hearing. (Marciel, M)
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/19/12: Jury Trial RESET for 2/4/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. In addition, the court sets November 30, 2012 as the last day for exchange of exhibits. (Kaminski, H)
October 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 121 APPOINTMENT ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/18/12 APPOINTING Attorneys Randall Dennis Haimovici and Rachael Michelle Smith for Stanley Sims. Attorneys added. Trial Confirmation Hearing RESET for 11/15/2012 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Counsel shall notify Sujean Park if they have any questions related to the appointment. (cc: SPark). (Attorneys served via electronic notification). (Meuleman, A) Modified on 10/18/2012 (Meuleman, A).
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/28/12 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit a confidential settlement statement as ordered on 01/31/12 and show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b) for his failure to prosecute and to comply with the court's 01/31/12 order. (Plummer, M)
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/30/12 ordering the parties to this action shall each, no later than 21 days from the date of the order, submit confidential statements. (See order for further details) (cc: ADR Director)(Plummer, M)
September 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/30/2011 ORDERING 104 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; defendant's 90 Motion for Summary Adjudication of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim is GRANTED; defendants are granted 30 days to file a pretrial statement as to plaintiff's remaining claims.(Waggoner, D)
August 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 104 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/09/11 recommending that defendant Halverson's 12/10/10 motion for summary adjudication of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against him regarding the confiscat ion of plaintiff's diet card in May 2005 90 be granted. Defendants be given 30 days to file a pretrial statement as to plaintiff's remaining claims. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 90 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
January 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/11/11 ORDERING that defendants reply brief is due 14 days from service of plaintiffs opposition. As plaintiff filed his opposition on December 30, 2010, the 14-day window runs from that date. Should plaintiff file additional opposition papers without obtaining the courts permission, defendants may seek appropriate relief from the court.(Dillon, M)
September 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER adopting 78 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/29/10: Defendants' November 25, 2009 motion for summary judgment is denied. Defendants are granted thirty days to file an appropriate motion. Plaintiff's September 8, 2009 "Application for Sanctions" 66 and October 28, 2009 "Motion for the Court to Order Damages" 71 are denied. (Kaminski, H)
August 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/31/2010 RECOMMENDING that dfts' 74 motion for summary judgment be denied; dfts be given 30 days to file an appropriate motion or alternatively a pretrial statement; pltf's 66 application for sanctions and 71 motion for the court to order damages be denied. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 65 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/2/09 RECOMMENDING that dfts' 49 motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part as noted in the F&R; that dfts be given 30 days to file an appropriate motion as to the remaining claims, or alternatively a pretrial statement as to those claims. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
August 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/19/09 ORDERING that dfts' 49 motion for summary judgment is RESUBMITTED on the briefs previously filed. (Yin, K)
February 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/05/09 ordering defendants' 02/02/09 motion 43 is granted and the date for filing dispositive motions is extended. ( Dispositive Motion due by 4/2/2009.) The court is granting 1 month more than is requested but does not intend to entertain requests for further modification. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sims v. Veal et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Haverson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. St. Germain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. Grannis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Veal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stanley Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?