Rivera et al v. Snow et al
| Juan Bautista Rivera and Cathy Ann Calfas |
| Mary L. Snow, Stephen M. Snow, Sarah A. Snow, Samantha E. Snow, Shaunna L. Wouda and Scott D. Wouda |
| 2:2007cv01097 |
| June 8, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/31/09 ORDERING that this matter concluded with a settlement agreement between the parties and their counsel of record. As such, this case is closed and the 77 motion for withdrawal of counsel is hereby moot. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/9/2009 ORDERING that all previously scheduled dates are VACATED; all dispositional documents to be filed no later than 15 calendar days from 4/3/2009. (Gaydosh, J)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/11/2007 ORDERING Status Pretrial Scheduling Conference set for 10/5/2007 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. The Clerk of the Court shall send pltf, along with this order the appropriate number of copies of the form "Consent to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge." Plts shall serve each dft with a copy of the consent form 3.(Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
