McCliss et al v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
| Marjorie McCliss and Mark McCliss |
| Department of Veterans Affairs, Jimmie Earl Ward and R. James Nicholson |
| 2:2007cv01154 |
| June 14, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Morrison C. England |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT DECREE signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/3/10. Civil Case Terminated.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
82
STIPULATION and ORDER 81 , signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/28/10: Dfts Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Verterans Affiars and the USA are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a). This case remains active against Dft Jimmie Earl Ward. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 01/27/09 GRANTING 66 Notice of Substitution of Defendant. Eric K Shinseki rep by Todd A. Pickles added. James B. Peake terminated.(Streeter, J)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/1/08: James B. Peake is substituted as defendant in place of R. James Nicholson, and all further proceedings in this action "shall be in the name of the substituted party." James B. Peake rep by Todd A. Pickles added. R. James Nicholson terminated. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
