St. Martin v. Mayberg et al.,
| Michael G. St. Martin |
| Stephen Mayberg, Jack Vogensen and John Hupka |
| 2:2007cv01174 |
| June 18, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Morrison C. England |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/22/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 30 are ADOPTED IN FULL; this action is DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 41(b). CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
33
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/6/10 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/17/09 ordering that within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve on Stephen Mayberg and Jack Vogensen, signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/05/09 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to forward plaintiff's instructions for service, the completed summons, copies of the complaint and this order to the USM. (cc USM Priority). (Streeter, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
