Dickey-O'Brien v. Yates et al
Rain Dickey-O'Brien |
James A. Yates and Attorney General CA |
2:2007cv01241 |
June 25, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Fresno |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
William B. Shubb |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/12/2013 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for writ of habeas relief be denied and this case be dismissed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/20/12 ORDERING that the respondent has fourteen days from the entry of this order in which to obtain all parts of the state court record not already included with the filing of lodged documents and lodge them with the court in this case. This order includes especially pages 338-339 of the Supplemental Reporters Transcript that are presumably still under seal in the Plumas County Superior Court. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/2/07 ORDERING that within 30 days petitioner shall submit an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send petitioner a copy of the IFP form used by this district. (Engbretson, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.