Masterson v. Huerta-Garcia
Plaintiff: Daniel J Masterson
Defendant: Silvia Huerta-Garcia
Case Number: 2:2007cv01307
Filed: July 2, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER signed by District Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/23/2011 ORDERING that Dfts 68 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Dft Baker's 70 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Pltf's 72 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition is GRANTED. Pltf's 73 Request the Court to Review Videos In Camera is DENIED. Dft Baker's 83 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Pltf's 85 Motion to Strike is DENIED. Pltf's 95 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Pltf's 96 Motion to Clarify and for Reconsideration is DENIED as moot. Pltf's 105 Motion to Strike Dfts Reply is DENIED. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/22/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 75 Motion for Clarification is GRANTED. Plaintiff is required to serve copies of his pleadings on the court, the Attorney General's office, and counsel for Defendant Baker at Longyear, O'Dea, and Lavra, LLP.(Duong, D)
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/28/2011 denying as MOOT 65 Motion for Scheduling Order and 67 Motion for Extension. (Waggoner, D)
March 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER signed by District Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/11/2011 DENYING 58 Motion for TRO. (Zignago, K.)
January 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER denying 59 Pltf's Motion to Instruct, signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/25/11. (Kastilahn, A)
September 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/30/2010 GRANTING Non-Baker defendants' 47 First and 48 Second Motions for Extension. Plaintiff's 45 Motion to Compel is GRANTED to extent that defendants will be precluded from offering any testimony or introducing any evidence during Pretrial Motion practice or at Trial concerning subject matter of any interrogatory that is not disclosed during Discovery; and DENIED in all other respects. (Marciel, M)
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by District Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/27/10: Defendants have until January 20, 2010, to file their opposition to Masterson's motion to compel further interrogatory responses. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Masterson v. Huerta-Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel J Masterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Silvia Huerta-Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?