Wright v. LinkUs Enterprises, Inc.
| Gabe Wright |
| LinkUs Enterprises, Inc. |
| 2:2007cv01347 |
| July 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Shasta |
| Morrison C. England |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/3/2010 ORDERING 97 The Court, for purposes of this Order, ADOPTS the definitions of "Class" and "Class Members"; The Court has personal jurisdiction over all Class Members, exc ept for those who have timely opted out of the Class;, and has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, including, without limitation, jurisdiction to approve the Settlement, issue an award of attorneys fees and costs to Class Counsel and enhanc ement awards to the Class Representatives; and entering final judgment that dismisses the action with prejudice after all sums due and owing under the Settlement are paid and which will permanently bar all claims released by the Settlement except for claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of those persons who did not submit a request to join the Class. The Class is certified. Based on the Motion for Final Approval and request for enhancement payments to the Class Representatives, which is uno pposed by Dfts, each Class Representative is awarded $5,000; Based on the materials submitted by Class Counsel in support of the request for an award of attorneys fees and costs, which is unopposed by Dfts, Class Counsel is awarded $625,000 as compensation and reimbursement for expenses. The Settlement monies shall be distributed as set forth in the Joint Stipulation of Settlement. This Order and the Final Judgment permanently bars all Claims released by the Joint Stipulation of Settle ment; The Court dismisses the action on the merits and with prejudice and the Subclass One Released Claims and Subclass Two Released Claims as defined in the Joint Stipulation of Settlement. The two persons who opted out of the Joint Stipulation of Settlement have not released any claims pursuant to this Order. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/25/09 CLARIFYING the class definition for all purposes in connection with the settlement. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/8/09 ORDERING that upon reviewing the Stipulation Requesting Court Approval of Final Versions of Class Notice and Claim Form filed herewith, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: The Court approves the final versions of the Class Notice and Claim Forms attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively, with one exception. Paragraph 10 of the Class Notice must be changed from "If the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, all Class Members who do not opt out are bound by the terms of the Settlement" to "If the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, all members of Subclass One who opt in and all members of Subclass Two who do not opt out are bound by the terms of the Settlement." (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
88
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/17/09 re 86 ORDERING that the Court GRANTS the stipulation in which the last day to file a motion for final approval of the settlement EXTENDED to 12/15/09 and the Hearing set for 1/28/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.(Duong, D) Modified on 8/20/2009 (Schultz, C).
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/28/09 GRANTING 71 motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement. The Court appoints pltfs Wright and Crowley as class representatives, and Robert W. Thompson and Kathleen Hartman of Callahan, McCune & Willis, APLC, as class counsel. Motion for final approval of settlement due within 120 days. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/16/2009 ORDERING 63 The modified claim form be, and hereby is, substituted in place of the existing claim form submitted in connection with the Motion for Preliminary Approval, and the Court will c onsider this modified claim form as part of its review of the Motion for Preliminary Approval; and The Settlement Administrator shall have 22 calendar days instead of 15 calendar days for purposes of mailing of the notices and claim forms pursuant to Section 12 of the Joint Stipulation ofSettlement.(Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wright v. LinkUs Enterprises, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gabe Wright | |
| Represented By: | Robert Walter Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LinkUs Enterprises, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
