Decker v. Yslas, et al
Plaintiff: Kevin L. Decker
Defendant: Yslas, Maples, - Georges and D. Togg
Case Number: 2:2007cv01379
Filed: July 12, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/3/09 ORDERING that pltf's 47 request/motion is DENIED w/out prejudice; pltf 49 motion for extension of time is GRANTED, the 50 Pretrial Statement is DEEMED TIMELY filed; ptlf to file his motion for witnesses on or before 3/2/2009; dfts' pretrial statement due by 3/16/2009; the Pretrial Conference on the papers is CONTINUED from 2/27/2009 to 3/27/2009 before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds; pltf's 1/30/09 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Yin, K)
February 7, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 02/06/08 ORDERING that dft Yslas to SHOW CAUSE w/i 20 days why default should not be entered; Clerk to serve this order on: Deputy Bronzon Yslas, Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept., Sacramento Main Jail, 615 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814 and shall also serve Jennifer Neill. (cc: Neill).(Benson, A) Modified on 2/7/2008 (Benson, A).
July 25, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 7/24/07 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit within 30 days from this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP. Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed IFP By a Prisoner and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from this order, and a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Cayo, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Decker v. Yslas, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin L. Decker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yslas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maples
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: - Georges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Togg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?