Contreras v. Sisto, et al
Ruben Contreras |
K. Sisto, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Edmund G. Brown, Jr. |
2:2007cv01490 |
July 24, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Craig M. Kellison |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/2/11 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 43 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. CASE CLOSED.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/18/11 ordering petitioner is directed to file a custody status report within 10 days of the date of this order. If petitioner is no longer incarcerated, he shall either file a notice of volunt ary dismissal or show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as moot. The notice of voluntary dismissal or response to the order to show cause shall be filed with the custody status report within 10 days of the date of this order. If petitioner has been released from custody and files a response to the order to show cause, respondent may file a response thereto within 10 days of the date petitioner's response is filed. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/30/2007 GRANTING 2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ruben Contreras, Sr. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.