Williams v. Walker et al
| John Wesley Williams |
| James Walker, A. Malfi, D Leiber, K. Kelly, W - Haythorne, C. Hague, Rodriguez, Rueller, M Arnt, - Raymond and A. Smith |
| 2:2007cv02385 |
| November 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/17/11 ORDERING that the Clerk shall close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/10/2011 ORDERING that dfts notify this court, w/in 7 days, whether they have any objection to the dismissal of this action. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/01/10 ordering plaintiff's motion 65 is denied without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/23/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 60 are ADOPTED in FULL; The unserved defendant Malfi is DISMISSED from this case without prejudice. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/18/10 denying plaintiff's motion 58 without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
60
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/03/10 recommending that the unserved defendant Malfi be dismissed from this case without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/21/09 ordering plaintiff must show good cause within 21 days why the unserved defendant Malfi should not be dismissed from this action. Plaintiff's first motion to compel further respons es/production to requests for production filed on 03/13/09 35 is granted in part and denied in part (See order for further details). Plaintiff's second motion to compel further responses to the first set of his interrogatories filed on 03/20/0 9 36 is granted in part and denied in part (See order for further details). In addition, to the extent that defendants have withheld any information based on the qualified official information privilege with regard to the discovery requests at issu e, which privilege was invoked without compliance with the procedural requisites, and in which any objection invoked on the basis is therefore waived, defendants must supplement all responses to include any information withheld on that basis within 1 4 days. All supplemental amended discovery responses must be served upon plaintiff, within 14 days of the date of this order, and proof of service thereof must be filed in this court with the same deadline. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint filed on 04/03/09 40 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for leave to propound additional discovery requests, filed on 04/09/09 41 is denied.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve on A. Malfi, signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/10/09 ordering the clerk of the court shall forward the instructions for service of process, the completed summons, copies of the complaint, a consent/ressi gnment form and copies of this order to the US Marshal. Within 10 days from the date of this order, the US Marshal shall notify defendant Malfi of the commencement of this action and to request a waiver of service of summons. The US Marshal shall retain the sealed summons and a copy of the complaint in their file for future use. The clerk of the court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court. (cc: USM)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/14/09 ordering the application of defendants for a four-week extension of time 28 is granted. Defendants Bernardino, Hague, Haythorne, Kelly, Leiber, Rodriguez, Ruller, Smith and Walker shall serve their responses to the outstanding discovery on or before 02/19/09. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
