Prophet v. Clark
Petitioner: Joseph Danny Prophet
Respondent: Ken Clark
Case Number: 2:2007cv02391
Filed: November 2, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 12/16/09 ORDERING that a certificate of appealability shall not issue in the present action. (Owen, K)
October 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 10/6/2009 recommending that 19 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph Danny Prophet be denied. Objections to F&R due w/in 20 days. (Matson, R)
July 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/16/09 denying without prejudice 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The matter is submitted for decision and in due course, the court will issue findings and recommendations. (Plummer, M)
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/16/09 ordering respondent shall file and serve either an answer or a motion in response to petitioner's application within 60 days from the date of this order. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and serve within 30 days of service of an answer. If the response to petitioner's application is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of the motion and respondent's reply, if any, shall be filed within 15 days thereafter.(Plummer, M)
January 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/27/09 ORDERING that respondent's 21 motion for more definite statement is DENIED as unnecessary; petitioner's 19 amended petition is DISMISSED w/ leave to amend w/in 30 days, alternatively, petitioner may inform the court to proceed on 11/2/2007 petition; petitioner's 22 request for appointment of counsel is DENIED w/out prejudice. (Yin, K)
November 7, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to Sacramento signed by Judge William M. Wunderlich on 11/6/07. New Case No. 2:07-cv-02391-FCD-EFB. (Verduzco, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prophet v. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph Danny Prophet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ken Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?