Yeager v. Cingular Wireless LLC et al
| Charles E. Yeager |
| Cingular Wireless LLC, Bellsouth, SBC Communications and American Telephone & Telegraph |
| 2:2007cv02517 |
| November 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Nevada |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| P.I.: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
305
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/30/2013. Plaintiff's 278 Motion for Attorneys' Fees is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff is awarded $7763.63. Plaintiff's 279 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
302
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/24/2013 RELATING this case to 2:13-cv-00007 GEB DAD; REASSINGING the related case to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller for all further proceedings; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to make the appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
298
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/22/2013 ORDERING Plaintiff's counsel to SHOW CAUSE, within 7 days, as to why 289 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney should not be denied given the pending 278 Supplemental Motion for Attorneys' Fees and the pending 279 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
297
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/21/2013 DENYING 271 Motion to Intervene. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
270
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/18/12 ORDERING that based on the foregoing, plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees and bill of costs are granted in part and denied in part. Specifically: Plaintiff is entitled to $160 ,757.00 in attorney's fees; Plaintiff is entitled to $5,728.42 in costs under California Civil Code Section 3344; Plaintiff is entitled to $7,100.30 in costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and Local Rule 292. Defendant is hereby ordered to remit to plaintiff within fourteen days of this order the total sum of $173,585.72. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
264
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/30/2012 ORDERING that Defendant's 242 Motion for Judgment is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
219
FINAL JURY INSTRUCTION signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/7/2012. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
210
PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/4/2012. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER re Motions in Limine signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/30/12. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/23/2012 DENYING 137 Request for costs and fees associated with Motions in Limine filed by Charles E. Yeager. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/27/11 ORDERING that the 104 findings and recommendations filed August 30, 2011, are adopted in full, with the exception of footnote four on page four. The final pretrial conference is confirmed for November 2, 2011. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
104
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/29/11 recommending that 98 Motion for Reconsideration filed by AT&T Mobility, LLC be denied. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/23/11, ORDERING that defendant notice a motion for reconsideration of the district court's denial of its summary judgment motion on the undersigned's calendar within 14 days of this o rder, or it will be considered abandoned. Pretrial Conference is SET for 11/2/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Jury Trial is SET for 12/5/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/1/2011 ORDERING that Pltf is substituted in propria persona and this case is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows, for case management and recommendations to the district judge. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/25/10 ORDERING that within seven days of this order, the parties are to advise whether any othermatters are outstanding; the Clerk of the Court shall serve this order on plaintiff in pro se. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER OF NON-RELATED CASES signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 8/9/2010 ORDERING that Judge Damrell declines to relate cases CIV. S-07-2571 FCD GGH and CIV. S-10-2055 JAM EFB. Therefore, CIV. S-10-2055 JAM EFB shall not be reassigned. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 12/28/2009 ORDERING 67 this district court action shall be STAYED pending the briefing, argument, andthis Court's ruling on Defendant's motion for certification of interlocutory appeal, pursu ant to 28:1292(b); In the event that the Court grants Dft's motion for certification and the 9th Circuit exercises its discretion to hear the appeal, this action is STAYED until the appeal is fully resolved. The current trial date of 3/30/2010 shall be VACATED; and the trial date, and all other attendant pre-trial deadlines, shall be re-scheduled at such time as Dft's motion for certification and any subsequent interlocutory appeal are fully resolved. CASE STAYED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 12/07/09 DENYING 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
