Price v. Marshall
Petitioner: William Henry Price
Respondent: John C. Marshall
Case Number: 2:2007cv02525
Filed: November 26, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Luis Obispo
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/22/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 42 ADOPTED IN FULL; this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
January 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/13/10 ORDERING petitioner's 01/15/09 first addendum request for relief 23 is denied. Petitioner's 01/20/09 motion for an evidentiary hearing 24 is de nied. Respondent's 03/09/09 motion to dismiss 29 is disregarded. Petitioner's 04/20/09 motion for leave to supplement his habeas petition 36 is denied. Petitioner's 05/29/09 request for judicial notice 37 is denied. Petitione r's 06/08/09 motion to enforce subpoena and compel production 38 is denied. Petitioner's 06/10/09 request for judicial notice 39 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that respondent's 03/18/09 motion to dismiss 31 be granted; and this action be dismissed. MOTION to DISMISS 31 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M) Modified on 1/14/2010 (Plummer, M).
April 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/9/09 ORDERING that petitioner's March 23, 2009 request for an extension of time to file his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss 32 is granted nunc pro tunc.(Becknal, R)
February 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/09/09 ordering respondent's 02/06/09 request for an extension of time 27 is granted. Respondent shall file a response to petitioner's amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus on or before 03/07/09. Petitioner's traverse shall be filed 30 days thereafter. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Price v. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Henry Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John C. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?