Crapo v. Curry
Dale Crapo |
Ben Curry and Attorney General CA |
2:2007cv02554 |
November 29, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Ronald S.W. Lew |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER and SECOND AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/04/11 ORDERING the 12/28/10 findings and recommendations 22 are vacated. Petitioner's motion to set a briefing schedule 25 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M) Modified on 2/4/2011 (Plummer, M). |
Filing 22 AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/27/10 RECOMMENDING that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be granted; Respondent Warden be ordered to release petitioner within sixty days of the adoption of these findings and recommendations if a new suitability hearing is not held; if a suitability hearing is held within that time, the parties be ordered to file status reports within thirty days of petitioners suitability hearing informing the court of the outcome of the hearing. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/02/10 denying 17 Motion to withdraw the findings and recommendations. Respondent's objections to the findings and recommendations are due within 28 days of the date of this order; petitioner may file a reply within 14 days thereafter. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/7/10 recommending that re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be granted; and the California Board of Parole Hearings be directed to set a parole date for petitioner within thirty days of the date of the adoption of these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.