Goodridge v. Hickman et al
Peter Goodridge |
Richard Subias, Rod Hickman, Jean Woodford, Carol Perez and Attorney General of California |
2:2007cv02650 |
December 10, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 CJA ORDER APPOINTING Attorney Meredith Fahn for Peter Goodridge signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 08/13/10. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 36 ORDER granting 35 Motion for Certificate of Appealability signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/13/2010. (Matson, R) |
Filing 29 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/26/2010 RECOMMEDING that repsondent's 22 motion to dismiss be granted and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 26 ORDER denying 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/01/09. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/19/09 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General)(Plummer, M) Modified on 8/19/2009 (Plummer, M). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.