Riches v. Omaha Westroads Mall et al
| Jonathan Lee Riches |
| Omaha Westroads Mall, Von Maur Department Store and Robert A Hawkins |
| 2:2007cv02654 |
| December 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| John F. Moulds |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/4/09 ORDERING that no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 02/06/08 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/o prejudice. Objections due w/i 20 days; referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 12/18/07 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk, or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against all defendants by Jonathan Lee Riches.(Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
