Wilson v. Walker et al
Petitioner: Steve Wilson
Respondent: J. Walker and Attorney General of the State of California
Case Number: 2:2007cv02752
Filed: December 20, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/23/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 2/15/11, are adopted in full; Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; the Clerk is directed to close the case; and the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. (Becknal, R)
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/14/11 recommending that petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing be denied; and petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
May 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/27/10 ORDERING that 27 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
February 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/08/10 recommending that respondents' 09/14/09 motion to dismiss 22 be denied. Petitioner's 04/23/09 request for leave to supplement his habeas petition 15 , 16 be denied as futile. Respondents be directed to file and serve an answer, and not a motion, responding to the application within 60 days from the date of this order. Petitioner be directed that his reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of an answer. Motions 15 , 16 and 22 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER denying 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/31/09. (Plummer, M)
July 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/16/09 denying 9 Motion to Stay. Respondents are directed to file a response to the petition as set forth in the court's 04/09/08 order with all dates being calculated from the date of service of the present order. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Walker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steve Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?