Rameses v Porter et al
Robert Rameses |
David Porter and Office of Federal Defender |
2:2008cv00361 |
February 19, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Ronald S.W. Lew |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin S. Chang on 10/26/09 RECOMMENDING that 1 Complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. (Owen, K) |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin S. Chang on 1/5/09 ORDERING that plaintiff's 5 request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350 of this action. Michael Mart el, Warden Mule Creek State Prison, or his designee, shall collect from plaintiff's prison account monthly payments in an amount equal to twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to plaintiff's prison account and shall f orward those payments to the Clerk each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b) (2) until a total of $350 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff and on Michael Martel. The court has not yet screened the Complaint to determine whether it sufficiently states a claim and shall proceed in the normal course. (cc: Michael Martel). (Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.