Fort Indepedence Indian Community v. State of California et al
| Fort Indepedence Indian Community |
| State of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General of the State of California |
| 2:2008cv00432 |
| February 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/6/10. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER denying 53 , 54 Motions for Summary Judgment, signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/23/09, and GRANTS summary adjudication to the issues listed in this order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/9/2009 GRANTING application 94 Substitution of Attorney; Attorney's Jack Duran and Robert Allen Rosette added for pltf Fort Indepedence Indian Community; Attorney's Albert Robert Rhoan, Jr, Michael A. Robinson, Darcie L. Houck and John M. Peebles terminated. (Suttles, J)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/3/2009 ORDERING the court AMENDS the scheduling order as follows: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/24/2009; Depositions of the designated experts will be permitted, but they must be scheduled so that they are completed by 11/24/2009; Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/19/2010 at 02:30 PM and Trial set for 4/20/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/8/2009. For the reasons stated in text, parties MAY provide, w/in 30 days of date of this Order, evidence as to amount of potential gaming revenue expected by the Tribe that may be attributed to statewide prohibition on non-tribal gaming. Such evidence MAY be accompanied by briefing not to exceed 10 pages, confined to this single issue. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
