Gore v. McDanials et al
Petitioner: Joseph K Gore
Respondent: E K McDanials and Gerry Brown
Case Number: 2:2008cv00448
Filed: February 27, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr., on 3/27/13 ORDERING that the certificate of appealability is DENIED; there has been no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (Kastilahn, A)
July 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr on 7/6/2012 ORDERING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph K. Gore is DENIED; CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D)
April 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/22/2010 DENYING petitioner's 26 request to stay. (Yin, K)
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING 34 Motion for Extension signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/28/2010. (Matson, R)
November 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER adopting 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/24/09: Respondent's 17 Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Respondent is directed to file an answer to the petition as reformulated and to petitioner's amended request for a stay (docket no. 26) within thirty days of this order. (Kaminski, H)
September 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/14/09 ORDERING that petitioner's 24 motion for a stay is DENIED. (Yin, K)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/21/09 RECOMMENDING that 17 Motion to Dismiss be granted as to petitioners claim that the prosecutor failed to correct witness Olivers testimony, included in ground fiv e of the petition, but denied in all other respects; To the extent that claim five of the federal petition alleges that the prosecutor failed to correct Olivers perjured testimony, it be stricken; and respondent be directed to file an answer to the petition as reformulated within 30 days of any order adopting these finding and recommendations. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gore v. McDanials et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph K Gore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: E K McDanials
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gerry Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?