Coats v. McGuiness, et al
William Thomas Coats |
John McGuiness, Carlos Cabrerra and Jarrod Hailey |
2:2008cv00476 |
March 3, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
San Joaquin |
Gregory G. Hollows |
John A. Mendez |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 157 STIPULATION and ORDER 156 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/20/10, ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 152 ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM, signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/30/10. The Warden of the High Desert State Prison, Susanville, CA is commanded to produce pltf William Thomas Coats to the U.S. District Court at 501 I St, Sacramento, CA, 14th Fl, Courtroom 6 on 9/27/10 at 9:00 a.m. to appear before District Judge John A. Mendez. The Clerk is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order and writ of hc ad testificandum on the Out-To-Court Desk, CSP-SAC. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 150 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/20/10 granting 146 Motion to amend and plaintiff's exhibit lists 143 , 146 be deemed plaintiff's proposed exhibits for trial. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 145 ORDER denying 138 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/08/10. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 135 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/17/10 ORDERING that this case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Dale A.Drozd on 9/2/10, at 10:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Litigation Office at High Desert State Prison via facsimile at (530) 251-5031.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 124 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/05/10 ordering the jury trial is moved to 09/27/10 at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable John A. Mendez. Plaintiff's motions for appointment of U.C. Davis Law Clinic and appointment of couns el 108 , 114 are denied. Plaintiff's motion to apply jury instructions 111 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for a 60 day extension 115 is denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion for expanded discovery 116 is denied. Plaintiff' ;s motion for a writ to appear at the pretrial conference by telephon 118 is denied. By 06/16/10, plaintiff shall submit a supplement to his pretrial statement addressing the witnesses he intends to call at trial and following the above procedures. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 98 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/25/10 ORDERING that pretrial conference is set for 4/30/10; plaintiff shall file his pretrial statement on or before 4/9/10; defendants shall file their pretrial statement on or before 4/23/10; Jury Trial set for 6/21/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge John A. Mendez.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 97 ORDER ADOPTING 86 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/109/2010. Defendants' 79 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 90 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/23/09 DENYING 88 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 86 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/26/09 ORDERING that 81 Motion for Extension of time is DENIED; RECOMMENDING that 79 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.