Cree v. Sisto et al
Petitioner: David Kenneth Russell Cree
Respondent: D.K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California
Case Number: 2:2008cv00487
Filed: March 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Chief Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski on 1/6/11 ORDERING that Cree's federal habeas petition is DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part. No reasonable jurist would conclude that my rulings on Cree's ineffective assistance and jury instruction claims are debatable or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Nor could reasonable jurists find that Cree stated a valid constitutional claim under Bruton, even if they might debate my procedural ruling. See id.; see also supra at 5. Cree therefore isn't entitled to a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c). CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
February 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/02/09 GRANTING 23 Request For Extension of Time. Respondent shall file and serve a reply to petitioner's supplemental briefing and declaration on or before Friday, 2/13/09. No further extension of time will be granted for this purpose. (Streeter, J)
January 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/12/09 ordering respondent's 12/31/08 request for an extension of time 21 is granted. Respondent shall file and serve a reply to petitioner's supplemental briefing and declaration on or before 01/30/09. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cree v. Sisto et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Kenneth Russell Cree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D.K. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?