United States of America v. Approximately $26,395.00 in U.S. Currency et al
United States of America |
Approximately $26,395.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $10,880.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $5,000.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $9,932.73 in U.S. Currency Seized from Washington Mutual Bank,, Approximately $9,966.82 in U.S. Currency Seized from Washington Mutual Bank, Approximately $26,712.81 in U.S. Currency Seized from Washington Mutual Bank, Approximately $2,976.06 in U.S. Currency Seized from Washington Mutual Bank, Approximately $413.67 in U.S. Currency Seized from Wells Fargo and Miscellaneous Grow Equipment |
2:2008cv00577 |
March 13, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Drug Related Seizure of Property Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
William B. Shubb |
Defendant |
U.S. Government Plaintiff |
21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/5/11. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 31 STIPULATION for PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/9/2010. (Duong, D) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/8/09 ORDERING that this matter is stayed for a period of 6 months. The status conference scheduled for 9/21/09 is Vacated and Rescheduled to 3/22/10 at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file a joint status report by 3/8/10. (Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.