Moreno v. Knowles
| Mike Knowles and Attorney General of the State of California |
| Peter Moreno |
| 2:2008cv00772 |
| April 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 7/20/2010 GRANTING 17 Motion to Dismiss. The petition for petition for habeas corpus is dismissed with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 7/6/10 ORDERING that on or before 8/6/10, each party must separately serve and file a brief, not exceeding 15 pgs in length, setting forth the party's position on the impact of Hayward on this c ase, in particular that "[t]he prisoner's aggravated offense does not establish current dangerousness 'unless the record also establishes that something in the prisoner's pre-or post-incarceration history, or his or her current de meanor and mental state' supports the inference of dangerousness;" Respondent must specifically identify those characteristics, other than the underlying commitment offense, that support a finding that release of the Petitioner to parole st atus poses a current threat to public safety, and point to the specific evidence in the record that supports that determination. Not later than 21 days after briefs in paragraph 1 are served and filed, each party may serve and file a reply brief, not to exceed 10 pgs in length, addressing those matters addressed in the other party's opening brief. The reply brief may not simply reiterate or restate arguments or issues covered in the party's opening brief. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
