USA vs Hernandez (2:02-cr-213-2 MCE)
Petitioner: Lino Hernandez
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2008cv00789
Filed: April 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER as to Lino Hernandez signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/6/09 ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations in full. Movant's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close companion civil case. CASE CLOSED. (Engbretson, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA vs Hernandez (2:02-cr-213-2 MCE)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lino Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?