Rognirhar v. Grannis, et al
Plaintiff: Strider Rognirhar
Defendant: N. Grannis, S. R. Moore, R Russell and Director of CDCR
Case Number: 2:2008cv00892
Filed: April 28, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by District Judge Lonny R. Suko on 8/19/2013 ORDERING that Defendant D. Foston and D. Van Leer's 36 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's first amended complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as against all Defendants, based on the 40 Joinder of Defendant Cate. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, forward a copy to Plaintiff at his last known address, enter judgment, and close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
May 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by District Judge Lonny R. Suko on 5/30/2013 ORDERING that Defendants are GRANTED an extension of time, up to and including 7/8/2013, in which to file a responsive pleading. (Zignago, K.)
February 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve * amended complaint * filed on * 5/11/2012,* on * D. Foston, D. Van Leer*, signed by District Judge Lonny R. Suko on 2/11/2013. Plaintiff's 25 Preliminary Motion To Compel Agents of Defendants to Comply With California Code of Regulations, or, in the alternative, Motion For Preliminary Injunction Enjoining Agents of Defendant Further Impeding Plaintiff's Access To The Court is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by District Judge Lonny R. Suko on 3/13/12 ORDERING the Court is directed to enter this Order and forward a copy to Plaintiff with a civil rights complaint form. Pursuant to the Mandate, Defendants S.R. Moore and R. Russell are dismissed. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rognirhar v. Grannis, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Strider Rognirhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. Grannis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. R. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director of CDCR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?