Bjorlin v. Saro
Daniel P. Bjorlin |
Saro |
2:2008cv00914 |
April 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Lassen |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Craig M. Kellison |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/28/2012 ORDERING 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; 49 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Defendant Gladney (sued as "Rooter") is DISMISSED from this action, which proceeds against defendant Saro ONLY. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 53 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 03/12/12 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 52 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/23/12 recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss 49 be granted and that Gladney (sued as "Rooter") be dismissed as a defendant to this action, which shall proceed against Saro only. MOTION to DISMISS 49 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 43 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/7/11 ADOPTING 37 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Defendant Hays is DISMISSED from this action and this action shall proceed against defendants Rooter and Saro only. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 37 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/21/2011 RECOMMENDING that dft Hayes be dismissed from this action, and that it proceeds against Rooter and Saro only. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/10/11 ordering plaintiff's motion:notice to show cause 34 is granted insofar as plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/9/09 DIRECTING USM to serve Amended Complaint filed on 11/21/08, on defendant Saro within 10 days. (cc USM)(Dillon, M) |
Filing 23 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/20/09. Service is appropriate for Saro. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 1 USM-285 Forms, 1 copy of the local rules, and 1 copy of the Amended Complaint filed on 11/21/08. Documents due within 30 days. (Owen, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bjorlin v. Saro | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel P. Bjorlin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Saro | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.