Seifert v. Werner
Kathleen Seifert |
Richard Werner |
2:2008cv00998 |
May 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Garland E. Burrell |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 159 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/12/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. This Case is CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 158 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/21/2014 ORDERING that plaintiff is directed to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen days of the date of this order why the action should not be dismissed for her failure to prosecute. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 155 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/11/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Sanctions and Defendant's CROSS-MOTION For Sanctions 148 and 151 are DENIED. The court notes the parties' filings but declines to consider them because doing so would contravene the stay in effect. The parties are once again directed to return to arbitration. Plaintiff is cautioned that any further motions filed here prior to the resolution of arbitration may result in the sua sponte di smissal of the action on the court's own motion for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. See Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 942 F.2d 648, 652 (9th Cir. 1991) (it is the responsibility of the moving party to move towards [ ] disposition at a reasonable pace, and to refrain from dilatory and evasive tactics). (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 149 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/7/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Application to Reconsider the 3/3/11 order denying Plaintiff's Motion to vacate the appointment of the arbitrator 142 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 141 ORDER denying 132 Motion to Vacate the appointment of the arbitrator signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/22/11. (Matson, R) |
Filing 139 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/18/2011 re 129 ORDERING that Attorney Sandra Ann Groven is terminated.(Duong, D) |
Filing 128 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/13/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 120 motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED. The Complaint remains the operative pleading and therefore, this action is ordered back to arbitrat ion. The parties previouslyselected John Ball as a neutral arbitrator and they are ordered to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the Contract. The parties shall advise the Court when arbitration is completed. This action is STAYED. No respons ive pleadings need be filed in the federal court action; rather, they will be filed in the arbitration. The Clerk of Court shall serve a courtesy copy of this order on the arbitrator, John Ball at the following address: 4401 Crestwood Way, Sacramento, CA 95822. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 112 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/3/10 DENYING pltf's 102 Motion to Return Case from Arbitration. The Clerk is directed to add Gregory Thyberg as counsel for deft. Clerk directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order on the arbitrator, John Ball. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action. The new caption for this case shall read 2:08-cv-998 GEB KJM. (Owen, K) |
Filing 96 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/24/09: Within fourteen days, defendant shall submit a list of proposed arbitrators. The matter shall then stand submitted. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 83 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/5/2009 ORDERING Service of the summons in this action on dft Werner shall be accomplished by publication in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, a newspaper published in Cleveland, Ohio, and designated as the newspaper most likely to give actual notice to dft residing in Cleveland Heights, Ohio. The publication shall be made once a week for 4 weeks. Since dft's address is known, pltf shall immediately mail dft a copy of the summons and complaint and this order for publication. This order does not preclude service on dft Werner in any manner specified in FRCP Rule 4 or CA Code of Civil Procedure sections 415.10 through 415.40. (Reader, L) |
Filing 80 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/22/2009 ORDERING the 61 motion to dismiss is denied; this matter is referred to VDRP. The VDRP process shall be completed no later than 3/31/2009. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on the courts VDRP coordinator. Except for service by publication and submission to VDRP, this action is stayed. (cc VDRP)(Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Seifert v. Werner | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kathleen Seifert | |
Represented By: | Kenneth Alan Pratt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Richard Werner | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.