KingVision Pay-Per-View v. Lavorico, et al
Plaintiff: KingVision Pay-Per-View, Ltd.
Defendant: Alex John Lavorico, Ted Villanueva and Club Coyote, LLC
Case Number: 2:2008cv01038
Filed: May 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER 31 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/2/2011 ORDERING that Default and Default Judgment as to TED VILLANUEVA dba Club Coyote only 25 , is hereby VACATED. (Krueger, M)
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 1/3/2011 ORDERING 29 that this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice against Alex John Lavorico, individually and dba CLUB COYOTE to the Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached between the Parties. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by 3/1/2014, this Court shall not have jurisdiction to set aside the dismissal and the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice. This dismissal is made pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. (Reader, L)
March 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/5/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall serve a copy of these findings and recommendations on each defaulted defendant and file a proof of service. It is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's 18 Motion for Default Judgment be granted; judgment be entered against defendants in the amount of $6,000; this case be closed. Objections due within 14 days. (Owen, K)
January 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER re 12 Dismissal of dft Alex John Lavorico, individually and d/b/a Club Coyote, signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/5/09. Dft Lavorico is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).(Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KingVision Pay-Per-View v. Lavorico, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KingVision Pay-Per-View, Ltd.
Represented By: Thomas Peter Riley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alex John Lavorico
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ted Villanueva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Club Coyote, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?