USA v. Real Property Located at 3115 Claremont Drive, Oroville, CA
| United States of America |
| Real Property Located at 3115 Claremont Drive, Oroville, California |
| Barbara Howell and Shirley E. Lacey |
| 2:2008cv01050 |
| May 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| John A. Mendez |
| None |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 42 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/9/11; 1. The claimant's motion for allowance of attorney's fees is GRANTED, and; 2. Judgment for attorney's fees in the amount of $ 4,074.30 is entered in favor of the Legal Services Corporation and against the United States. Payment is to be made directly to claimants counsel John Balazs. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/9/11 ORDERING The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and between the parties to this action. Judgment is hereby entered against Shirley E. Lacey and Barbar Howell, a nd all other potential claimants who have not filed claims in this action. W/in 30 days of from the date the stipulation is signed, claimants Lacey and Howell shall pay to the United States the sum of $5,000.00 (the "settlement amount" ;) as the substitute res in lieu of the forfeiture of the defendant real property. Claimants Lacey and Howell shall send a cashier's check for $5,000.00 made payable to the U.S. Marshals Service to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Attn: Ass et Forfeiture Unit, 501 I Street, Suite 10-100, Sacramento, CA 95814. All right, title, and interest in said funds shall be substituted for the defendant real property and forfeited to the United States to be disposed of according to law. W/in 30 da ys of full payment of the settlement amount, the United States shall record a withdrawal of the lis pendens against the defendant real property. Plaintiff United States of America and its servants, agents, and employees are hereby released from any and all liability arising out of or in any way connected with the filing of the Complaint and the posting of the defendant real property with the Complaint and Notice of Complaint. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and unantici pated injuries, and/or damages arising out of or in any way connected with the filing of the Complaint and the posting of the defendant real property with the Complaint and Notice of Complaint, as well as to those now known or disclosed. There was re asonable cause for the posting of the defendant real property and the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action, and a Certificate of Reasonable Cause shall be entered accordingly. All parties are to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/8/2010 GRANTING 30 Motion to Compel; Claimants shall respond to all interrogatories and requests for production w/out objection, except on the basis of attorney client privilege, by 11/8/2010. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/16/2009 ORDERING that all parties now appearing by counsel, the referral to the magistrate judge is withdrawn. However, the magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties described in Local Rule 72- 302(c)(1)-(20).(Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
