Cunningham v. Rodriguez et al
Robert Cunningham |
Rodriguez, Patricia Manderville, J.P. Gonzalez, L. Lesane, Suzan Hubbard, Shread, J Helfrich and N. Grannis |
2:2008cv01215 |
June 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Kings |
Marsha J. Pechman |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER of DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Marsha J. Pechman on 4/5/10 ORDERING this matter DISMISSED and directs the Clerk to enter judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by District Judge Marsha J. Pechman on 9/16/09 GRANTING 14 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to Pltf and issue summons. (Engbretson, K.) |
Filing 12 [WITHDRAWN pursuant to 16 Order] ORDER signed by District Judge Marsha J. Pechman on 8/14/09: This matter is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H) . Modified on 9/17/2009 (Engbretson, K.). |
Filing 11 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Marsha J. Pechman on 7/24/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff must show cause in writing why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to pay a filing fee or re-submit an IFP application. Said writing must be filed no later than 14 days from the entry. Show Cause Response due by 8/10/2009.(Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.