Claiborne v. Schwarzenegger et al
| Dennis Gerald Claiborne |
| A. Schwarzenegger, N. Grannis, T. Felker, D. Christie, T. Robertson, M. Wright and M.D. McDonald |
| 2:2008cv01319 |
| June 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Lassen |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/27/10 denying 42 Motion to Proceed IFP to seeking relief in the appellate court.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/18/09 ordering the findings and recommendations issued on 06/26/09 28 are vacated; Defendant's motion to dismiss 21 is granted. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is revoked. This action is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing with pre-payment of the full statutory filing fee. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/27/09 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court to REASSIGN this case to the Honorable Craig M. Kellison as the presiding judge; the caption on all documents filed in the reassigned case shall show case number CIV-08-1319 CMK P. (Carlos, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
