Ortiz v. John E. Potter
Plaintiff: Olga G Ortiz
Defendant: John E. Potter
Case Number: 2:2008cv01326
Filed: June 11, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 71 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 07/14/10 ORDERING this matter DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
July 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/7/10 ORDERING that the parties' Stipulation and [PROPOSED] ORDER for the Confidentiality of the Deposition of Richard Matsuhiro is not approved.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/14/10 ORDERING that pursuant to the parties 66 Settlement, dispositive papers are due within 30 days of the date of this order. All previously scheduled dates in this case are vacated. (Owen, K)
April 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/1/10, ORDERING that dft's motion for a protective order is DENIED. Pltfs' request for sanctions is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
March 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/5/10 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION 30 is GRANTED. On 3/9/10, or on another date agreeable to the parties' counsel, Plaintiffs Ortiz and Soto shall each attend and undergo mental examinations consistent with defendant 's revised notices of mental examinations filed with the court on 3/2/10 35 . Counsel for defendant shall provide Dr. Polfliet with a copy of this order prior to the examinations; The respective examinations shall not exceed eight hours in duration; For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing on defendant;s motion, the examinations shall not be recorded.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortiz v. John E. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Olga G Ortiz
Represented By: Tania Beth Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?