7/11 Materials, Inc., et al v. County of Tehama et al
Basic Resources, Inc. and 7-11 Materials, Inc. |
John Stoufer, County of Tehama, Tehama County Board of Supervisors, Tehama County Planning Commission and George Robson |
2:2008cv01373 |
June 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Tehama |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Both |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 04/09/12 ORDERING that the 97 Motion for Extension is GRANTED; the parties shall submit their final settlement documents by 04/20/12. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 76 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/7/2011 ORDERING Defendants' Revised Motion For Summary Judgment is ACCEPTED for filing; dfts are GRANTED permission to exceed the page limit for their Points and Authorities in support of the R evised Motion for Summary Judgment such that it shall not exceed 30 pages; pltf's Points and Authorities in opposition to the Motion shall not exceed 30 pages without prior permission from this court; The hearing on the Revised Motion is HEREBY set for 10/6/2011 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 7 of this Court; dfts are directed to re-notice their Motion for that day, since the 10/5/2011 date provided in the Amended Motion 71 is not an available date for hearing motions on the Court's calendar. (Reader, L) |
Filing 54 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/15/2011 ORDERING 53 that Dispositive Motions shall be filed filed by 7/29/2011; All other dates modified by the most recent stipulation and order of this Court filed on 3/29/2011, shall remain the same. (Reader, L) |
Filing 52 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/28/2011 51 ORDERING that Dispositive motions ddl 7/15/11; All non-expert discovery ddl 8/15/11; Expert witness disclosures ddl 9/26/11. All other dates and/or deadlines contained in the December 22, 2009 Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order shall remain in effect, including the December 1, 2011 Final Pretrial Conference and the January 23, 2012 trial date.(Duong, D) |
Filing 45 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/4/11 ORDERING that All Non-Discovery to be completed by 2/28/2011. Expert WitnessesDisclosures to be completed by 3/31/2011. Dispositive Motions to be filed by no later than 5/2/2011. All other dates set forth in the Court's Amended Scheduling Order shall remain the same. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 41 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/15/10. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 38 STIPULATION and ORDER 36 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 9/14/10: Discovery shall be completed BY 11/30/10. Designation of Expert Witnesses is DUE by 12/30/10, and rebuttal experts to be disclosed 20 days thereafter. All Dispositive Motions are to be filed NO LATER than 2/28/11. All other dates set forth in the Court's 12/29/09 Scheduling Order shall remain the same. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 35 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/25/2010. (Matson, R) |
Filing 30 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/26/09 re 28 29 ORDERING that All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by February 12, 2010. All other dates set forth in the Court's 27 October 30, 2008, Scheduling Order shall remain the same.(Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.