Pirritano v. City of Redding, et al
| Denise Pirritano |
| City of Redding, County of Shasta, Redding Police Department, Shasta County Sheriff's Office, Leonard - Moty, Tom Bosenko, Chris Smyrnos, Eric Wallace, Edward Gilmette and JPR Foundation, Inc. |
| 2:2008cv01488 |
| June 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Sacramento |
| Morrison C. England |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/22/2011 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice against all remaning defendants. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/26/10 ORDERING dfts' motion for summary adjudication 24 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Summary adjudication is GRANTED as to Pltf's claims for violation of the EDAC PA and violation of Section 1983 as alleged against Chief Moty and Sheriff Bosenko; Summary adjudication is DENIED as to Pltf's claims for violation of Section 1983 as alleged against City of Redding and County of Shasta, Plaintiffs claim for Negligent Hiring and Training, and all claims alleged against Officer Wallace. (Carlos, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
