Newsome v. Schwarzenegger et al
| Doris Newsome |
| Arnold Schwarzenegger, Roderick Q. Hickman, James E. Tilton, James D. Hartley, Robin Dezember and Meet Boparai |
| 2:2008cv01510 |
| July 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/16/14: This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety as to all Defendants, served or unserved, and the parties to bear their own fees and costs. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 01/18/12 ORDERING that defendants' 76 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; defendants Peter Farber-Szekrenyi, Kathy Mendoza-Powers, S. Surya, James E. Tilton, Meet Boparai are DISMISSED. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/10/2010 ORDERING 62 Moving Defendants' 62 Motion, as well as Colonial's 65 request for joinder in the Motion are hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Defendants Thomas C. Wen, M.D., Sarabijit Singh, M.D., Kern Cardiology Medical Group, and Colonial Medical Group, Inc. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
