Shives v. Sisto et al
| Thomas Shives |
| D.K. Sisto |
| 2:2008cv01548 |
| July 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/14/11 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/14/10 ORDERING that respondent shall show cause, within 14 days, why he should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with the courts order; and within 14 days, respondent shall also file his answer to the petition.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/26/10 ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; Respondent's 14 Motion to Dismiss the petition as untimely is DENIED; Respondent is directed to file and serve an answer and not a motion in response to petitioner's application within 60 days. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of an answer. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/03/09 recommending that Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely 14 be denied. Respondent be directed to file and serve an answer and not a motion in response to petitioner's application within 60 days. Petitioner be directed that his reply, if any, be filed and served within 30 days of service of an answer. MOTION to DISMISS 14 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/9/09 ORDERING that the action denominated as 2:09-cv-1483 JFM is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption ondocuments filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as No. 2:09-cv-1483 EFB.Clerk shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/1/09 ORDERING that within 30 days from the day this order is served, petitioner may submit either the filing fee or the IFP application. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to petitioner a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shives v. Sisto et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas Shives | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: D.K. Sisto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
