Kelsaw v. Horel
| Rufus Harty Kelsaw, IV |
| Bob Horel |
| 2:2008cv01612 |
| July 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Del Norte |
| Morrison C. England |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/8/2012 DENYING 60 Motion for Relief from 56 Judgment. (Michel, G) Modified on 2/9/2012 (Michel, G).
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/29/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 9/14/10 are ADOPTED IN FULL; petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and a certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 11/18/10 ORDERING that the Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel 49 is hereby DENIED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 9/30/10 ORDERING that petitioner is granted an additional 30 days to file additional objections to the 9/14/10 findings and recommendations; 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
41
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 9/13/10 RECOMMENDING that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&Rs due within 21 days of service. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/5/2010 ORDERING that upon reconsideration, the 35 order of the magistrate judge filed February 2, 2010 is affirmed, and petitioner's 37 February 18, 2010 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/2/2010 ORDERING that respondent's 22 motion to unseal petitioner's state court Marsden transcript is GRANTED; petitioner's 27 motion to expand the record and for evidentiary h earing is PARTIALLY GRANTED and PARTIALLY DENIED, the record is expanded to include the declaration attached to petitioner's motion and transcript of his state court Marsden hearing, petitioner's request for evidentiary hearing is DENIED w/out prejudice; petitioner's 23 motion for discovery is DENIED; and petitioner's 33 motion to file an oversized brief is GRANTED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/13/2009 DENYING 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. (Gaydosh, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kelsaw v. Horel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rufus Harty Kelsaw, IV | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bob Horel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
