Martinez v. Sisto, et al
| Anthony Martinez |
| D.K. Sisto and Arnold Schwarzennegger |
| 2:2008cv01786 |
| August 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| John F. Moulds |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 08/19/10 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/5/2010 ORDERING that respondents have 30 days to file a response to petitioner's 2/11/10 status report. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/13/09 ORDERING that The FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 7/28/09 25 are ADOPTED in full; Respondents' 10/10/08 MOTION to Dismiss 9 is DENIED. Respondents shall answer the petition within thirty days from the date of this order. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondents' answer is filed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/27/09 RECOMMENDING that 9 MOTION to DISMISS be denied; Respondents be directed to answer the petition within 30 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations; and petitioners traverse, if any, be due on or before 30 days from the date respondents answer is filed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 10 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/21/09 GRANTING petitioner's request to withdraw 13 Motion to Dismiss. On or before 1/31/09, petitioner shall file and serve an opposition to respondents 10/10/08 motion to dismiss; Respondents reply, if any, shall be filed and served not later than 15 days thereafter. The court will issue a further scheduling order, as appropriate, following resolution of respondents motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
