Foss v. US Marshal Services, et al
| Raymond C. Foss |
| US Marshals Service, Redding Police Department, Todd Rowen, Fort Mill Police Department, Charles - Robinson, Wilkins, - Lucas, - Irvin and L. Dan Malphrus, Jr. |
| 2:2008cv01791 |
| August 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Carlos T. Bea on 04/01/11 ORDERING that, per plf's 19 Notice of intent to not file an amended complaint, this case is DISMISSED per FRCP 41(a)(2). CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Carlos T. Bea on 10/12/10 ORDERING that Foss' MOTION for Reconsideration 11 is DENIED for lack of any showing of evidence which could not earlier have been produced through the exercise of due diligence. Foss has not shown facts sufficient to impugn the validity of the waiver of extradition (see 12 Response). Foss' extradition rights-based claims shall be DISMISSED with prejudice.(Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified docket text on 10/12/2010 (Waggoner, D).
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Circuit Judge Carlos T. Bea on 3/25/2010 ORDERING the plaintiff to show cause within 30 days why the Court should not dismiss his extradition rights-based claims for failure to state a claim.(Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
