Murillo v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Plaintiff: Manuel Murillo
Defendant: Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Case Number: 2:2008cv01974
Filed: August 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Labor: Fair Standards Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/20/10 GRANTING the final certification of the settlement class and approves the settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement as fair, reasonable, and adequate. The court finds an award o f $150,000.00 to be an appropriate amt for attorneys' fees, costs, and plaintiff's enhancement pmt. Consummation of the settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement is therefore approved, and the d efinitions provided in the Settlement Agreement shall apply to the terms used herein. The Settlement Agreement shall be binding upon all members of the class action who did not timely elect to be excluded and all members of the collective action who chose to opt-in. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for final approval of the class and collective action settlement be and the same hereby is, GRANTED. (Becknal, R)
July 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/14/2010 GRANTING 44 Defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Request to Appear Telephonically at Final Fairness Hearing. The courtroom deputy shall initiate the telehpone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K)
March 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM and ORDER RE: Preliminary Certification of a Conditional Settlement Class signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/4/2010. A Final Fairness Hearing is set for 7/19/2010, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable William B. Shubb. (Matson, R) Modified on 3/5/2010 (Matson, R).
February 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/11/2010 GRANTING plaintiff's 36 Request to appear telephonically for Motion Hearing on 3/1/2010. (Marciel, M)
February 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/2/10 GRANTING Defendant's 34 Request to Appear Telephonically at 3/1/10 motion hearing. (Owen, K)
July 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/22/09 re 24 ORDERING that plaintiff is allowed to file the Second Amended Complaint. (Duong, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murillo v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manuel Murillo
Represented By: Michael Lion Tracy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?