Valdez v Unknown
Plaintiff: Ricardo Valdez
Defendant: Unknown
Case Number: 2:2008cv01978
Filed: August 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER signed by Senior Judge David Alan Ezra on 4/30/2020 REVOKING plaintiff's IFP status. Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal in the Ninth Circuit within 30 days after being served with this order. (cc Ninth Circuit Court) (Coll, A)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER signed by Senior District Judge David Alan Ezra on 4/2/2020 DENYING Plaintiff's 72 second Motion to Reopen the Case. (cc: P. Springs, CRD) (York, M)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER signed by District Judge David Alan Ezra on 2/5/2020 DENYING 70 Motion to Reopen Case and Motion to Appoint Counsel and ORDERING that Plaintiff be provided with a copy of this Court's order at his address of record so that Plaintiff is alerted to the status of his closed case. (Huang, H)
May 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 5/9/2012 GRANTING 46 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter Judgment and Close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 2/21/2012 GRANTING 54 Defendants' Request to file and serve their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment up to and including 2/24/2012. (Reader, L)
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 2/3/12 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION to modify the 8/30/11 Scheduling Order 50 is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in part. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
August 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 SECOND AMENDED RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 8/29/11: Jury Trial is SET for 3/13/2012 at 09:00 AM, and the Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 2/8/2012 at 09:00 AM before District Judge David A. Ezra. Seperate pre-trial statement are due BY 2/1/2012. Motions in limine shall be filed BY 2/13/2012, and Opposition to motions shall be filed BY 2/20/2012. All motions not otherwise provided in this order shall be filed BY 10/26/2011. Plaintiff's disclosure of non-expert witnesses shall be filed BY 10/19/2011, and defendants' disclosure of non-expert witnesses shall be filed BY 10/26/2011. Plaintiff's Designation of Expert Witnesses is due BY 10/26/2011, and defendants' Designation of Expert Witnesses is due BY 11/2/2011. The discovery deadline shall BE 12/16/2011. (Kastilahn, A)
August 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 8/24/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and Plaintiff's MOTION for Appointment of Counsel 38 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING 39 Motion signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 5/17/11; The Court will issue an amended scheduling order accordingly.(Matson, R)
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 3/29/11 ORDERING that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 25 and Plaintiff's Judicial Notice Request 33 are DENIED. (Becknal, R)
October 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 10/13/10 ORDERING dfts Motion to Modify 30 the scheduling order 23 deadlines is GRANTED; after adjudication of dfts' Motion to Dismiss for pltf's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, the Court will issue an amended Scheduling Order, as necessary, in due time. (Carlos, K)
September 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 9/2/10 ORDERING dfts' request for extension of time 27 to file reply in support of motion to dismiss is GRANTED and dfts' to serve and file their reply on or before 9/10/10. (Carlos, K)
June 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 6/28/10: Discovery: Plaintiff shall comply by July 29, 2010. Defendants shall comply by August 5, 2010. Motions filed by 9/15/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/17/2011 at 09:00 AM in Visiting Judge (TBD) before District Judge David A. Ezra. Jury Trial set for 2/22/2011 at 09:00 AM in Visiting Judge (TBD) before District Judge David A. Ezra. (Kaminski, H)
March 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 3/3/10 ORDERING pltf's Motion for Default Judgment 18 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER and ORDER Directing Service by the USM without Prepayment of Costs, signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 11/13/09. The Clerk is directed to forward the instructions for service of process, the completed summons, copies of the complaint, a nd copies of this order to the USM. Within ten days from the date of this order, the USM is directed to notify dfts Officer Walker, Officer Guffee, and Officer Voron of the commencement of this action. The Clerk shall serve upon pltf a copy of the Local Rules of Court.(Kastilahn, A)
October 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 10/5/09 ORDERING Service is appropriate for Walker, Guffee, Voron. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 3 USM-285 Forms, and a copies of the Amended Complaint filed on 9/11/09. (Becknal, R)
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 8/26/09 ORDERING pltf's Complaint 1 is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim; pltf is GRANTED 30 days leave to file an amended complaint; the Clerk of the Court is directed to send pltf a 1983 complaint. (Carlos, K)
January 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING COLLECTION OF FILING FEE signed by District Judge David A. Ezra on 01/07/2009 GRANTING 6 Application filed by Ricardo Valdez. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350 for this action. Warden at Mule Creek State Prison shall collect from Plaintiff's prison account monthly payments in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaint iff's prison account and shall forward those payment to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until a total of $350 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff and Warden at Mule Creek State Prison. (cc Financial and CDC Prisoner Payments). (Streeter, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valdez v Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricardo Valdez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?