Concrete Washout Systems Incorporated v. Neaton
Plaintiff: Concrete Washout Systems Incorporated
Defendant: Neaton Companies LLC
Case Number: 2:2008cv02088
Filed: September 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/13/09 ORDERING that dispositional documents should be filed no later than 11/30/2009. (Owen, K)
October 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER granting 86 and 88 pltf's Motions to Compel, signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/6/09. Dft Neaton Co and its officers/managing agents Kelly Neaton and Christopher Neaton shall appear for deposition at the time and plac e set by pltf. Within ten days from the date of this order, dfts shall produce the documents requested in the deposition notice and in the request for production of documents, set no. one. Reasonable expenses incurred in connection with this motion are awarded to pltf against dfts in the amount of $ 1,075.00. (Kastilahn, A)
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 85 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/9/09. (Becknal, R)
September 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 84 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/3/09 re 82 ORDERING that Discovery ddl is EXTENDED to 10/8/2009. (Duong, D)
February 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/3/09 DENYING plaintiff's 41 Motion for coercive sanctions. (Marciel, M)
January 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/12/09 ORDERING that Defendant shall show cause on February 2, 2009, in courtroom 10, commencing at 9:00 a.m., why Defendant and its agents should not be held in contempt and sanctioned for failing to comply with the PI. Defendant may file a supplemental opposition on or before January 20, 2009. Plaintiff may file a reply on or before 1/27/09. (Duong, D)
January 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/5/09 ORDERING that the time for Defendant Neaton Companies, LLC to respond to Plaintiff's Application for Order to Show Cause is EXTENDED to 12/31/08 at 12:00 p.m. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Concrete Washout Systems Incorporated v. Neaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Concrete Washout Systems Incorporated
Represented By: Chris Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neaton Companies LLC
Represented By: Nicholas P. Forestiere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?