Landi v. Martell
| Michael J. Landi |
| 2:2008cv02099 |
| September 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Amador |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/06/09 DENYING 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. (Streeter, J)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/15/2009 ORDERING that Petitioner show cause, within 20 days, why respondent's November 5, 2008 motion to dismiss should not be granted. (Streeter, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Landi v. Martell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael J. Landi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
